Neoadjuvant FLOT versus SOX phase II randomized clinical trial for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China. rjsurgeon@hotmail.com. Department of Pathology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Clinical Research Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Department of Medical Oncology Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China. Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China. lc10897@rjh.com.cn. Department of General Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, China. zzg@rjh.com.cn.

Nature communications. 2020;(1):6093

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FLOT regimen) has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (LAGC). However, tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) is the preferred chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. Here, we conduct an open label, two-arm, phase II randomized interventional clinical trial (Dragon III; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03636893) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens. Patients with LAGC are randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen (40 patients) or 3 cycles of the SOX regimen (34 patients) before gastrectomy. The primary endpoint is the comparison of complete (TRG1a) or subtotal (TRG1b) tumor regression grading in the primary tumor. There are no significant differences in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. No significant differences in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT group and the SOX group are found. Complete or subtotal TRG is 20.0% in the FLOT group versus 32.4% in the SOX group. Therefore, our study does not find statistically significant differences between neoadjuvant FLOT and SOX regimens for the primary outcomes reported here in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Methodological quality

Metadata